Kamal Ghorui
NEW DELHI: The absence of crowds in Pakistan Super League (PSL) 2026 matches has sparked debate after Islamabad United owner Ali Naqvi offered an unusual explanation, linking it to Pakistan’s role in global diplomacy. His remarks suggested that empty stadiums were part of a larger national effort, though this version differs from what officials, including Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Mohsin Naqvi, had earlier stated.
Ali Naqvi’s claim and reaction
In a post on X, Naqvi argued that Pakistan prioritised peace efforts over cricket entertainment, especially due to its involvement in ceasefire discussions.“Not hosting matches in Pindi makes complete sense — Islamabad was clearly the chosen venue for sensitive ceasefire discussions, and the unpredictable timing demanded absolute flexibility on logistics and security,” he added.He remarked that security resources were focused on bigger priorities, ading, “When forced to weigh entertainment against helping deliver global peace, I believe every Pakistani would have made the exact same call.”Naqvi also dismissed comparisons with other leagues, saying, “Also, comparisons with another league that has allowed fans, are simply not valid.”
Official version and criticism
However, this explanation clashes with the Pakistan Cricket Board’s earlier statement. PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi had said the no-crowd policy was due to a fuel shortage limiting public movement.“The [Pakistan] Prime Minister [Shehbaz Sharif] has requested restricted movements of people because of the fuel crisis, so we have decided that the PSL would continue as per the original schedule but without crowds,” he had said.Critics argue that linking empty stadiums to global peace efforts stretches the narrative too far. What appears to be a practical issue, fuel shortages and logistics, has been reframed as a major diplomatic sacrifice.
