Kamal Ghorui
A good example of a headline that does not lose relevance many years after being published would be one that came out in 2018 regarding Michael Bloomberg’s donation of $1.8 billion to Johns Hopkins University, his alma mater. The press release from the university declared that the sum was the biggest-ever contribution received by any learning institution in American history. But behind this impressive number, the story was unfolding in the unassuming lives of prospective students who had yet even to apply.The sheer size of the donation was staggering, but what gave it historical significance was its intended use. Bloomberg did not set aside the money for building another stadium or creating another high-tech research facility. Rather, the billionaire philanthropist chose to focus on overcoming the one obstacle that prevents young people from moving up the social ladder in America – the price of entry. As mentioned in the official press release in the Johns Hopkins University President’s Message, the endowment was intended for use in undergraduate scholarships alone. The donation enabled the institution to embrace the idea of need-blind admissions forever.This move solved a psychological obstacle which, oftentimes, goes unnoticed. To the brilliant but economically challenged students, the high tuition fees act as an absolute barrier. In such circumstances, most of them prefer not to apply at all since they assume that they won’t be able to repay the student loan. Therefore, by eliminating their fears, the donation provided an opportunity to a whole new group of idealists to consider their chances of pursuing a superior education.The permanence of structural aid over the news cycleTraditionally, philanthropic aid is aimed at fostering excellence among students. But this case of charitable giving is unique, as it involved the use of funds to create opportunities for excellence. With this donation, the university made it possible for a lot of its graduates to repay less debt due to the scholarships they received instead of costly student loans. According to Bloomberg’s opinion piece published in The New York Times, this kind of structural change in the educational system will enable the youth to follow their passions and work in fields where they can make the greatest impact on society.The effects of such a large-scale change are backed up by the mission of ensuring that top education is available to those who deserve it based on their merits and not just their bank balances. Based on the news reported in Bloomberg News, this donation will guarantee that the university is able to cover all the financial needs of all the accepted students without having to borrow money. It is expected that this will have an even larger impact since these students will then lift their communities based on their successes.
This historic gift eliminated financial barriers for talented students, allowing them to pursue education based on merit, not wealth. Image Credits: Wikimedia Commons
Moreover, this gift was a means for a discussion of the role of privilege in higher education. It implied that the value of a prestigious institution should be based on the number of promising candidates who receive financial support from the university rather than the total number of candidates that get rejected by it. In securing the endowment fund, the university made sure that the effect would go beyond being a one-time scholarship campaign and would be rooted in its DNA.A long legacy of opportunityPerhaps it is the personal story connected to the gift that contributes to making it more interesting to tell and to analyse. Bloomberg has often said that a modest sum of money was his first donation to the university, which was motivated by a desire to thank it for a chance to get the education he had. Over the decades, the gratitude transformed into action and a decision to make a change. Not only did the man give something back, but he did his best to provide future generations with similar opportunities.In the end, however, the headlines regarding the $1.8 billion amount have faded away, but the stories created by such headlines have only just begun. Each year, another group of students enters the gates of Johns Hopkins University with the knowledge that they have earned their place through nothing more than their own natural ability and sheer determination. The spectre of debt has not burdened these students, and they can take pride in the understanding that they were not a budgeting choice for the university in making its decision to admit them.
