Imagine this: you go to buy petrol for your car, but the petrol pump says, “No fuel for you!” Why? Because you don’t have a special paper called a PUC certificate (Pollution Under Control).
Now here’s the strange part — the government is also not giving that certificate to your car if it is “too old”!
What’s going on?
In Delhi, the government has made a rule:
- Diesel cars older than 10 years
- Petrol cars older than 15 years
These cars are called “end-of-life” vehicles.
So even if your old car is working fine and not very polluting, you:
- Can’t get a PUC certificate
- And without it, you can’t even get fuel
That means your car becomes useless.
Why did they do this?
The goal is good
Delhi has very bad air pollution, and the government wants to reduce it.
But what’s the problem?
The rule may not be fair or logical:
- Old doesn’t always mean dirty
- Some old cars are well-maintained and don’t pollute much
- Some big new cars (like SUVs) can actually pollute more
- Other countries do it differently
Places like Germany and Japan:
- Test each car properly
- If your car passes the pollution test, you can use it — no matter how old it is
- It can be hard for people
- Many families can’t easily afford a new car
- Forcing them to replace a working car can mean taking loans and spending a lot of money
- Making new cars also causes pollution
- Building a new car uses energy and materials
- So throwing away a good old car can actually harm the environment too
What might be a better idea?
Instead of banning cars just because they are old:
- Check how much pollution each car actually produces
- Punish the really polluting ones
- Improve public transport (like fixing the “last-mile” problem — getting from metro to home)
The big idea
Fighting pollution is important — but rules should be:
- Fair
- Logical
- And not hurt people who are already struggling
Otherwise, a rule meant to help the environment can end up causing new problems
Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author’s own.
END OF ARTICLE